Examinetics provides on-site medical screening and industrial hygiene consulting for more than 3000 companies in 18,000 locations across the contiguous United States. They have helped companies comply with occupational safety regulations and protect the health of their workforce since 1968.
When CEO Paul Fenaroli joined Examinetics in 2019, he began looking for a way to increase scheduling reliability and efficiency to bring down transportation and overtime costs without decreasing bookings or increasing pressure on the company’s team of nationally distributed technicians, who are vulnerable to burnout given the travel-intensive nature of their work.
In late 2023, Fenaroli reached out to his advisor at a private equity firm with the idea of engaging an analytics firm to revamp the company’s approach to scheduling.
Fenaroli and the firm worked together to hire Stratus Data to optimize Examinetics’s complex auditory technician routing process and build scale into the business model without sacrificing employees’ quality of life.
Challenges: Right Place, Right Time, Right Technician, Right Equipment
Examinetics relies on a team of schedulers assigned to defined regions of the country to route technicians and testing equipment, whether in tandem or separately, to clients when needed. Scheduling is a dynamic process, requiring schedulers to put technicians on site to fulfill work orders of various sizes for far flung clients that often use shift work schedules and require testing outside of standard business hours.
Scheduling efficiency could not come at the expense of either booking fewer clients or keeping technicians on the road for more consecutive days. Examinetics must also comply with all Department of Transportation driver safety requirements when moving equipment to client sites.
Adding to the challenge was the state of the data. Where it existed, available data was fragmented across multiple systems and often manually curated. Coordination across scheduling regions was limited, generating significant inefficiencies in border areas. Seeing the full picture was impossible for even the most experienced schedulers, who often had to rely on instinct, especially when last-minute scheduling changes arose.